REVIEW: “Parallels and Convergences: Mormon Thought and Engineering Vision”


14 April, 2012 - [ 2 Comments ]

Howe_Bushman__ParallelsTitle: “Parallels and Convergences: Mormon Thought and Engineering Vision”

Editors: A. Scott Howe, Richard L. Bushman

Publisher: Greg Kofford Books

Year: 2012

Paperback: 226 pages

Price: $24.95 Kindle edition:  $9.95

"Mormonism," said Brigham Young, "embraces every principle pertaining to life and salvation, for time and eternity. No matter who has it. If the infidel has got truth it belongs to Mormonism. The truth and sound doctrine possessed by the sectarian world, and they have a great deal, all belong to this Church. ...There is no truth but what belongs to the Gospel. It is life, eternal life; it is bliss; it is the fulness of all things in the gods and in the eternities of the gods."

Parallels and Convergences: Mormon Thought and Engineering Vision brings together a series of essays that were first presented at Claremont University in 2009.

Edited by Richard Bushman and A. Scott Howe, this volume seeks to explore, practically, what Brigham Young envisioned.

Some of the earliest classic texts of Mormonism, such as those by the Pratt Brothers, sought to place the religious visionary principles of Mormonism as they understood them within the scientific world as was then understood. True Religion was not separate from science, but was perhaps even the overarching science.

Parley Pratt wrote in A Key to the Science of Theology, that "The present is an age of progress, of change, of rapid advance, and of wonderful revolutions...A new era has dawned upon our planet, and is advancing with accelerated force – with giant strides. [Advances in' technology], with their progressive improvements in speed, safety and convenience, are extending and multiplying the means of travel, of trade, of association, and intercommunication between countries whose inhabitants have been comparatively unknown to, or estranged from, each other."

Pratt then, in the context of his book, sought to express how these understandings apply to his vision of the Gospel in that day. He would have been saddened to see a day where the Church stopped seeking to learn from and apply the advances of the world's knowledge. The authors of Parallels and Convergences are seeking - and in my opinion, succeeding - to carry on Parley Pratt's vision, letting it be enhanced by our "age of progress", rather than feel hindered or threatened by it.

It's a book of marvelous speculations that open up the vision of how beautifully and practically Mormonism can (and probably even should) be wed with our increase in scientific knowledge.

You will find essays that excitedly explain how quantum physics, nanotechnology, transhumanism, space exploration, and even virtual programmed worlds open to our eyes potential models of the eternities, and even the very nature of resurrection, the millennium, and 'spiritual creation'. The essays come from a wide degree of differing personal interpretations of the Eternal Story of Mormonism (some are more inspired by Brigham Young, some B.H Roberts some even Tad Callister and Cleon Skousen), but in the end, prior to my initial assumptions, it doesn't diminish their vision, but rather serves to effectively illustrate how expansive and powerful ideas inspired by the Wide World of Mormonism can be.

While I didn't always agree with the ultimate conclusions of the essayists, all of them made me consider some aspects I hadn't before. In one early essay, due to the essayist's stated belief in one particular theological model, I initially read through it not expecting to learn, or to be enlightened in any way by it, having made up my mind that the assumptions the essay were based on would not to speak to me. But I was surprised when an idea and interpretational paradigm was presented that indeed had not occurred to me before. In spite of not expecting or particularly desiring to learn from this essay, I was taught, and inspired. That is the sign of a remarkable teacher.

A key message of the entire collection is that our faith and vision doesn't need to be held back by ancient shepherds' or pioneers' technology and understanding of the workings of the world. We can 'map' our technological understanding and development onto their expansive vision - and in many ways, that may indeed be the only way to bring their visions into reality and fulfillment. It is a call to not just hope that some day we may live again, or that we will live in a magically made paradise earth - but rather to very literally, through our acquired knowledge and technology, and guided by inspired vision, to work and apply engineering skills to "bring to pass the immortality and Eternal Life of man".

This book was a blast. I highly recommend it.

Tithing, Malachi, Jesus, and the Book of Mormon


21 February, 2012 - [ 1 Comment ]

colbert-christianity-atheism-novel-apologetics

I presented a form of the following as a Sacrament Meeting talk in our Stake this past Sunday, February 19, 2012. My assigned topic by our Stake President was Malachi 3:8-10.

President Uchtdorf gave vital counsel this past week as part of his keynote message in the Worldwide Leadership Training broadcast.

As part of the message, he notes the importance of viewing the scriptures not simply as an answer key, but as a catalyst to new learning, and further revelation. He emphasized the importance of continuing to seek learning from even familiar scriptures, especially when we feel certain we already know what they mean.

President Uchtdorf said,

"Unfortunately, we sometimes don't seek [new] revelation or [new] answers from the scriptures ... because we think we know the answers already... as good as our previous experience may be, if we stop asking questions, stop thinking, stop pondering, we can thwart the revelations of the Spirit. Remember, it was the questions young Joseph asked that opened the door for the restoration of all things. We can block the growth and knowledge our Heavenly Father intends for us. How often has the Holy Spirit tried to tell us something we needed to know but couldn't get past the massive iron gate of what we thought we already knew?"

Along with President Uchtdorf, I invite you to follow this counsel next time you hear familiar scriptures, such as the ones often repeated in Sunday School lessons, or memorized as Scripture Mastery. The ones that you have an automatic answer as to 'what it means' - I invite you to study them further.

Our Stake President has taught that it is regularly the case that the stories found in the scriptures can contain greater lessons when viewed as an illustrative whole, than when viewed as simply the sum of its individual quotes and verses.

In the spirit of this counsel by both a General President and our Stake President, my message comes from exploring Malachi 3:8-10.

Michael Heiser, Myth, and My Evolving Approaches to Study of Ancient Scripture


14 January, 2012 - [ 2 Comments ]

nephilim

Recently, Michael Heiser placed online (temporarily) a first draft of his book, "The Myth That Is True". Among Biblical Studies circles, Heiser is well known for his scholarship concerning the Divine Council in the Bible. He was made more well known in Mormon academic communities by his somewhat lengthy exchanges/debates with LDS Scholar David Bokovoy.

Having a bit of interest in the development and interconnection of OT theology, myth, and history, I excitedly placed the digital draft of Heiser's book on my Kindle, and began to read.

No, God didn’t give my wife Cancer.


19 December, 2011 - [ 5 Comments ]

spockIn this past Sunday's Gospel Doctrine lesson on the Johanine Epistles, there was a discussion about God's love, and how we all should all be able to not just know about it, but truly feel it. It was suggested that one thing that can cause one to be unable to feel the full effects of that love is sinful behavior. A further conclusion was stated that if someone is unable to feel God's love, they should take a look at their life, and find out what they need to repent of in order to get right with God.

I quickly voiced an, umm,  clarified perspective.

While it is true that there is sinful behavior that can perhaps dull one's spiritual and emotional sensitivity, that should never be the first assumption one makes if someone shares that they are having difficulty feeling God's love.

I have known individuals who have suffered from clinical depression. One of the effects of this can be the deep inability to feel  any pleasant emotion. Our class teacher was quick to acknowledge this, relating an example of  a family member who suffered depression who confided that while they knew intellectually at that time that they loved their children, they just couldn't feel it at that time. That alone was devastating.

To tell someone who is already depressed that they are depressed and unfeeling because they are a sinner is horrible, destructive, and completely insulting not only to the suffering individual, but to God as well.

D&C 3: My Translation


9 December, 2011 - [ No Comment ]

jacob-wrestling

Introduction

My "Translation" (see my introduction to this project here) of Doctrine and Covenants 3 was a different experience than the one of D&C1. D&C 1, in its original,  was directed to the entire Church, and was very much a public exhortation. D&C 3 is an extremely personal message of combined chastisement and reassurance.

This was never as clear to me as it was when trying to unpack this as a personalized message. Joseph had been going forth with the Book of Mormon project. Martin Harris, after bugging Joseph to show the manuscript to his family in order to foster some household unity, was allowed to do so. This resulted in the loss, or rather theft, of the manuscript.

This, in association with the death of a child, sent Joseph into depression, and self-doubt about his standing and worth before God. This revelation came during this period. Rendering it as an internal monologue brought its power incredibly close to home for me. In it, we see Joseph's struggle with his calling, his self-worth, working out what he knows about God and his plans and his own effect on them, and what his mission is in life. It ends with a new realization and conviction of his charge. In the revelation, which is very much a personal wrestle, Joseph understood and learned something about God's love and mercy, and then realized it was his mission to spread that knowledge further. It's powerful, and raw. And I think we miss some of that when re-rendered as a stilted KJV-ese mandate from the Voice of God. It causes a degree of separation that, for me, hid some of the raw emotion and power behind it. I am very much enjoying - and learning from - this process of 'retranslation'.

Unlike the previous attempt, I have, for the most part, ignored verse numbers, and added my own paragraphing as it fit my prose.

D&C 1: My Translation


8 December, 2011 - [ 1 Comment ]
book_of_commandmentsThe following comes from a new approach I've taken to studying the Doctrine and Covenants, as an attempt to find how the text can speak to me today, and wondering how it would sound if it was presented in a current idiom, also stripped from the "First Person Divine Dictation" rhetorical device. Since the current Apostles and Prophets have no longer seen a need to continue this device with their current messages to the Church, I feel alright with following their precedent in the personal updating of this message for a modern day.As such, this  would definitely not be considered a "Formal Equivalent" translation, but more of a Functional Translation - an updating and revising of the language to speak to me, personally,  today. I have sought to strip away the mechanics of Joseph's language and rhetoric, and sought to find what the freshness of the underlying revelation may have attempted to convey.I don't expect everyone to see the same things I do, or agree with all, or even most, of my decisions in re-rendering the message. That's fine. I'm not acting as translator for the Church, I'm not proclaiming special insight for everyone, I'm not claiming to present New Scripture.

But I am  performing a personal study and "likening" for myself. If it serves as a catalyst for someone else approaching the scriptures in a similar way, and finding a new way for the scriptures to speak to them, then that's fantastic. Just don't set me up as trying or claiming to do (or be) something I'm not.

With that said, I bring you what I see - at least today -  when I read the first section of the Doctrine and Covenants. (You can see the original scriptural basis here ).

Ideological Conversion (or, I Have A Testimony of The Green Gospel: Now What?)


23 November, 2011 - [ 4 Comments ]

how-to-recycle-newI've learned from sad experience that choosing to convert to a moderate secular ideological outlook and/or praxis can, in some ways, be both very similar to, and at times more difficult, than converting to a new religion.

When you commit to a religion, there's generally different degrees of regular support built in.

NOTICE: Upcoming Mormon Studies Books


4 November, 2011 - [ 8 Comments ]

bookstackJust wanted to note some of what are, to me, some of the most interesting and intriguing books coming up in Mormon Studies -specifically related to Mormon historical and theological development -  in the next few months as well as the upcoming year. Is there anything else not listed here you think I should be aware of? Let me know in the comments below!

Also, if you haven't seen it yet, the Joseph Smith Papers Online Edition has recently published online the entire 1830, 1837, 1840, and 1841 editions of the Book of Mormon, as well as the 1844 Doctrine and Covenants (the edition not reprinted in full in JSP:RT2 – Published Revelations). That in and of itself is amazing.

Church Historian's Press

November 15, 2011 –

Spring 2012

  • Joseph Smith Papers, Histories, Volume 1

Fall 2012

  • Joseph Smith Papers, Histories, Volume 2

Oxford University Press

December 2011 –

Future -

Greg Kofford Books

December 2011 -

Early 2012 (Note that the prices listed for many of these below titles - the $999.99 ones – are only placeholders!)

Spring 2012

Summer 2012

Harvard University Press

Fall 2012 (?)

REVIEW: “Knowing Brother Joseph Again: Perceptions and Perspectives”, by Davis Bitton


29 October, 2011 - [ 2 Comments ]


Bitton - KnowingTitle:
"Knowing Brother Joseph Again: Perceptions and Perspectives"

Author: Davis Bitton

Publisher: Greg Kofford Books

Year: 2011

Price: $19.95  (paperback), $9.95 (Amazon Kindle)

Who was Joseph Smith?

It's a great question. And during this "Mormon Moment" when people are asking "What is Mormonism?", it's not a far jump to the next inevitable questions concerning its founder.

The simple and highly general assertion, "Joseph Smith was a man who in the early 1800s produced the Book of Mormon, and then later formed what would become known as the Mormon Church", might be enough for some just wanting to know general context. But many, upon being introduced to this figure, will want to know more.

But when the question is asked, what are they looking for? A History lesson? A Missionary Discussion? Are they looking for Top Ten Reasons To Love Brother Joseph? Or are they more interested in Top Ten Reasons to Demonize Ol' Jo Smith? Do they even know those widely different options exist, or why they do exist?

The late Davis Bitton's essay collection Knowing Brother Joseph Again: Perceptions and Perspectives may be my new favorite "Intro to Joseph" text.

Jesus’ First Vision


8 September, 2011 - [ 9 Comments ]

jesus-baptismI want to begin this post by plugging the fantastic series A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus by John Meier. In unexpected ways, it  has been a wonderful companion to my study of early LDS Church history. The series, written by a believing Catholic scholar, sets out to present all that is knowable about the historical figure Jesus of Nazareth from purely a scholastic perspective, a set of data that could be agreed upon by a theoretical 'unpapal conclave' made up of Catholics, Protestants, Jews, Atheists, and others. It deeply analyzes the culture of the time, and asks many provocative questions I had not even considered asking.

The second volume in the series ( Volume 2: Mentor, Message, and Miracles) opens with an exploration of John the Baptist, and what we can understand concerning Jesus' relationship to him. In the course of this, the question was raised as to why Jesus actually went to John to be baptized.

LDS generally have a quick answer to that question, an interpretation coming from the Book of Mormon's  meditative take on the subject in 2 Nephi 31:6-8:

6 And now, I would ask of you, my beloved brethren, wherein the Lamb of God did fulfil all righteousness in being baptized by water?

7 Know ye not that he was holy? But notwithstanding he being holy, he showeth unto the children of men that, according to the flesh he humbleth himself before the Father, and witnesseth unto the Father that he would be obedient unto him in keeping his commandments.

8 Wherefore, after he was baptized with water the Holy Ghost descended upon him in the form of a dove.

This is generally simplified and summed up to express, "Jesus was baptized because baptism was a commandment, and he did it to set an example."

The assumption generally comes that when Christ was baptized, and the sign of the dove appeared with the concurrent voice declaring his Sonship, that this was nothing new to Jesus, but was rather meant for the benefit of others.

While I had earlier been turned to think of this experience as being a first apocalyptic-esque vision experience for Jesus ( inspired by a reading of Margaret Barker's The Revelation of Jesus Christ), Meir's book substantially added to the power of this concept for me.

Meier asks about Jesus' motivations for receiving John's baptism, a baptism that was presented as a unique means of declaring one's allegiance to God, and as a sign of protection and one's freedom of sin, against the coming fiery Eschaton.

The question is first raised, "Was Jesus baptized by John because he was a sinner?" - it is immediately pointed out that, from a historical and scholastic perspective,  this is an impossible question. Since Sin is by definition that which is unpleasing to God and separates one from him, one cannot historically and scholastically determine if anyone has done anything that is 'unpleasing to God and separates one from him'.

The relevant question, however, is, “"Was Jesus baptized because he thought he could have been a sinner?"

This question blew me away. I had never even considered it before.